Educator's Corner Banner

Return Back Graphing Thermal Expansion of Water & Greenhouse Gases
Teacher Background


Ice Cave at Waters EdgeHumans are only able to live on Earth because of a "greenhouse effect." Without this our world would have been too cold for life to have colonized the surface of the planet. Life subsequently "terraformed" Earth: living organisms, cyanobacteria or blue-green algae, "made" the oxygen we humans need to survive. Life today is the product of changes in Earth's atmosphere caused by ancient life. Climate change is natural and real: without it we would not exist. But all this happened over millions and millions of years. Climate change today is also real, but it's happening during our lifetime and many experts consider our way of life industrialization and the use of fossil fuels to be the primary cause. In order to understand the present climate and what may be ahead, scientists are collecting information stored in rocks, ice, and sediment to understand Earth's climate history. They are taking the ocean's temperature and measuring the extent of sea-ice cover. They are probing beneath thick glaciers and drilling through multi-million year old ice sheets. They are recording carbon dioxide and methane levels. And most of this exploration and research is happening in the polar regions. In terms of global climate change, the Poles turn out to be more sensitive than anywhere else on Earth. Climate change, in a sense, begins at the ends our planet.



Activity 1:
What Impact Might Sea Level Rise Have?

Objective
  • To have students observe the effect of thermal expansion on water level
Engage

If global temperatures increase, many scientists have indicated that an increase in sea level is the most likely secondary effect. Two factors will contribute to this accelerated rise in sea level. First, although the oceans have an enormous heat storage capacity, if global atmospheric temperatures rise, the oceans will absorb heat and expand ("thermal expansion") leading to a rise in sea level. Second, warmer temperatures will cause ice currently locked up in glaciers and snowfields on land to melt, thereby increasing the amount of water in the oceans. An accelerated rise in sea level would inundate coastal wetlands and lowlands, increase the rate of shoreline erosion, exacerbate coastal flooding, raise water tables, threaten coastal structures, and increase the salinity of rivers, bays, and aquifers.

Explore/Explain

Materials: (for each team of 4 students)
  • conical flask
  • portable clamp-on reflector lamp
  • two-hole cork for flask
  • 150-watt floodlight
  • thin glass tube
  • dye
  • long thermometer
Procedure:
  1. Completely fill the flask with very cold water (to improve visibility, dye can be added.)

  2. Place the cork in the stopper. Slide the thermometer and glass tube in the holes in the cork. The water should rise a short way into the tube. Have students record both the temperature of the water and the water level in the glass on their data sheets.

  3. Have students predict what will happen to the water level when the flask is exposed to heat and record this prediction on their data sheet. Place the flask under the lamp. Turn on the lamp and record measurements every 2 minutes.

Expand:
  1. Make a graph of the thermal expansion experiment.

  2. Summarize the results of the lab and relate to the problems of global warming and sea level rise.

  3. Challenge your students to design an experiment using ice cubes to test their hypothesis in the final discussion question. (See also Activity 3)
Discussion:
  • Why did the level of water in the flask change?
  • What does this experiment suggest might occur if the oceans warm? Challenge your students to consider the possible impacts of sea-level rise in areas such as Bangladesh or South Florida.
  • If global warming is not sufficient to cause significant snow and ice melt, would you expect this thermal expansion to be enough to cause coastal flooding and erosion problems?
  • Which would you expect to have a greater effect on sea level the melting of Arctic sea-ice, the Greenland ice cap, or ice sheets in the Antarctic? (This is a big of a trick question: the melting of sea-ice has no effect on sea levels, except in "uncorking" glaciers and ice streams which then can flow more easily down into the ocean. It's dynamic ice sheets such as that in Greenland and in West Antarctica that could, potentially, have a major impact on sea level. East Antarctica, for now, seems relatively stable, and actually seems to be gaining ice. For more, see Activity 3.)
This activity was excerpted from P2K's LIVE FROM ANTARCTICA Teacher's Guide and originally adapted from "Global Change Education Resource Guide," published by UCAR/NOAA, p. III, 19-24, based on an EPA Report.



Activity 2:
Analyzing Greenhouse Gases Over Time


Objectives
  • To have students organize raw data by using charts and graphs
  • To have students analyze the charts and graphs to see trends in the data and extend the analysis into the future
  • To have students draw valid conclusions based on authentic research data.
Engage

Inform students that they have been assigned a position in a research institution dealing with global issues. A research scientist has just given them "raw data." Within the week a major international conference on this material will be held and they need to analyze the data. The data need to be presented and organized in a meaningful and useful way.

Explore/Explain

Materials: (for each team of students)
  • raw data
  • pencil
  • graph paper
  • ruler
  • Note: students can plot the data by hand or use appropriate computer software
Procedure:
  1. Discuss where data come from, types of graphs available, what a trend is, and how to project a trend.

  2. Divide class into small teams and have each team use different data sets.

  3. Have students simulate the role of a research scientist. (It might be interesting to have them write a description of the kind of person they expect such a researcher to be. Then have them compare their expectations with the scientists seen during the POLAR-PALOOZA video podcasts.)

  4. Using accompanying data, have students plot the values and make the curve for at least one graph. Make sure different graphs are assigned so they each can be discussed.

  5. Upon completion of the graph(s), have students continue the trend of the curve for another 50 years.

  6. Have each student or student group develop a conclusion for their particular graph. Have students with the same graph get together and compare graphs for accuracy and conclusions.

  7. Ask for a spokesperson for each type of graph to report a consensus view and a minority view for the interpretation of the graph.

  8. Discuss the role of data analysis in scientific research. How do choices in displaying data affect communication?
Expand:
  1. Make a display of the various graphs and conclusions.

  2. Explore the Internet for raw data currently being reported by scientists working in Antarctica or in Greenland. Follow the analytic procedures and report findings to the class.

  3. The graphs will indicate a rising trend in several greenhouse gases. The debate about the increase in greenhouse gases as a major factor in global warming continues. But it is important to note the reduction in CFC levels which was the result of an international agreement to decrease production. CFCs are not only a greenhouse gas, but also destroy the ozone layer which protects us from the sun's harmful ultraviolet radiation.

Raw Data
Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases Affected by Human Activities
ppmv = Parts per million by volume
Click Here to Download the Data in MS Excel Format

CO2 Concentration

Year ppmv
1958 314.8
1959 316.1
1960 317.0
1961 317.7
1962 318.6
1963 319.1
1964 319.4
1965 320.4
1966 321.1
1967 322.0
1968 322.8
1969 324.2
1970 325.5
1971 326.5
1972 327.6
1973 329.8
1974 330.4
1975 331.0
1976 332.1
1977 333.6
1978 335.2
1979 336.5
1980 338.4
1981 339.5
1982 340.8
1983 342.8
1984 344.3
1985 345.7
1986 346.9
1987 348.6
1988 351.2
1989 352.9
1990 354.2
1991 355.6
1992 356.4
1993 357.0
1994 358.9
1995 360.9
1996 362.6
1997 363.8
1998 366.6
1999 368.3
2000 369.5
2001 371.0
2002 373.1
2003 375.6
2004 377.4
Methane Concentration

Year ppmv
1850 0.90
1879 0.93
1880 0.90
1892 0.88
1908 1.00
1917 1.00
1918 1.02
1927 1.03
1929 1.13
1940 1.12
1949 1.18
1950 1.20
1955 1.26
1956 1.30
1957 1.34
1958 1.35
Year ppmv
1975 1.45
1976 1.47
1977 1.50
1978 1.52
1979 1.55
1980 1.56
1981 1.58
1982 1.60
1983 1.60
1984 1.61
1985 1.62
1986 1.63
1987 1.65
1988 1.67
1989 1.69
1990 1.72
CFC Production

Year Amount
1955 100
1957 120
1959 140
1961 150
1963 150
1965 200
1967 225
1969 290
1971 320
1973 375
1975 350
1977 360
1979 330
1981 325
1983 320
1985 340
1987 300
1989 305
1991 310
Nitrous Oxide

Year ppmv
1750 283.0
1760 283.5
1770 284.0
1780 284.0
1790 285.0
1800 285.5
1810 286.0
1820 286.5
1830 287.0
1840 287.5
1850 288.0
1860 288.5
1870 289.0
1880 289.5
1890 290.0
1900 291.0
1910 292.0
1920 292.5
1930 293.0
1940 294.0
1950 295.0
1960 297.0
1970 299.0
1980 305.0
1990 310.0

The above activities are excerpted from P2K's LIVE FROM ANTARCTICA 2 Teacher's Guide.
For more information go to passporttoknowledge.com/antarctica

North and South Banner

Polar Palooza Home | About The Poles | About Polar Palooza | The Travelers
Educator's Corner | Sites and Cities | The HDvCC | Media Palooza
Supplies & Resources | Credits & Contacts | Site Search | Polar Palooza Blog

Polar Palooza Logos
POLAR-PALOOZA and the materials on this website are based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0632262. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of PASSPORT TO KNOWLEDGE/Geoff Haines-Stiles Productions, Inc., and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation NASA IPY Page International Polar Year Passport to Knowledge