QUESTION: How do you detect Marsquakes? ANSWER from Jeff Plescia on December 18, 1997: Two sesimometers were flown on the Viking spacecraft back in 1976. One of them worked, the other failed to uncage. Because the seismometers were located within the spacecraft body and were not isolated, they mostly saw the wind blowing over the lander body (they were very good anemometers). There was one event that was recorded during the night (when the winds were normally low - but at a time when there was not recorded meteorology data) that might be a Mars quake. Given all of the uncertainties, not much could be done with one signal and one station. A good reference for the Viking experiment is Anderson et al 1977, J. Geophysical Research, v. 82, p. 4524-4546. Another approach to Mars seismicity was taken by looking at the length of faults and the ages and trying to estimate the total seismic moment per year and from that trying to estimate how many quakes per year there might be. That work was done by Golombek et al (1992, Science, v. v. 258, p. 979-981) In general there should be no difference detecting Mars quakes from detecting earthquakes. One would use the same types of seismometer and couple them to the ground in the same way. It would be expected that Mars would be less seismically active than the earth and the quakes would probably be distributed differently. Most of the terrestrial quakes are associated with plate boundaries. Since there are no plate tectonics on Mars, there would not be the plate boundary earthquakes. The Mars quakes would be similar to intraplate earthquakes. Depending upon the problem you were tyring to study, one would lay out a different array. If you were only interested in seeing the large quakes and maybe trying to determine something about the interior, then three or four stations spread across the planet would be fine. If you were trying to determine the details of seimsicity in Tharsis, then it would require an array laid around Tharsis with probably a half dozen or more stations.