QUESTION: If the Mars atmosphere is less than 1% than that of Earth, how can a parachute of the size you are using be sufficient? It would seem to me that you would need a parachute close to 1000' wide to achieve the same effect. Would you please explain the dynamics of placing a lander on Mars, and why a small parachute would work on Mars as it does on Earth? ANSWER from Rob Manning: You ask a very insightful question. The bottom line is you're right, parachutes this small aren't sufficient on Mars! On Mars Pathfinder, as on Viking, we use a "small" 40.5 ft (12.5 m) chute. It was scaled so that, with our lighter lander, it does about as much for the our descent speed as does Viking's. Our terminal velocity seconds before getting to the ground (where the atmosphere is "thickest") is still about 65 m/s (146 mph)!! You are correct, it would indeed take a larger chute to get slower "normal" Earth-like terminal velocities. Our chute on Mars is about the equivalent of a chute 38 times smaller in area on Earth (6.5 ft across!), and this includes the effect of Mars' lower gravity! A chute that could lower our lander to the Martian ground at a gentle 10 m/s (22 mph) would have to have an area about 42 times larger than our "little" chute (or a diameter of 263 ft)! That's 42 times the mass (and volume) of our 10 kg chute, or 420 kg, more than the mass of our entire lander! It wouldn't fit! We would need to have a "gossamer" (ultra-light weight material) parachute and then figure out how to get it open at high speeds! This is why we turned to solid rockets to stop our lander just before we hit the ground. Viking, too, used liquid rockets to slow the terminal decent. Also Pathfinder's airbags protect the lander from the local terrain variations (bumps, craters, rocks, hills, etc.) after the rockets do their thing. So why do we do we use a chute at all? Well, parachutes might not be all that good at laying a lander gently down on the Martian surface, but they do a spectacular job of braking something moving very fast. Remember, the drag FORCE a chute generates (therefore its deceleration), is proportional to the square of the velocity and only linearly proportional to the atmospheric density; so even a thin atmosphere and a "small" chute will do much to slow our entry vehicle down once the heatshield's aerobraking has been mostly achieved. This is also true of heatshield, our entry vehicle (like Viking's) enters the upper atmosphere at 7 km/s (or more than 15,000 mph!). Most of this is reduced by the friction with the heatshield. But even 2 minutes later, our vehicle is still screaming in at nearly 400 m/s (900 mph) when the parachute opens before slowing down to 65 m/s near the ground. I'd say that reducing our velocity by a factor of 6 (a factor of 36 in kinetic energy), isn't all that bad for only 10 kg of extra payload mass, wouldn't you? So, the short answer is, you're right, parachutes don't work on Mars like they do on Earth (neither do airbags, but that is another story), but they do a great job when you need to slow down something that is whipping through the Martian atmosphere FAST! --Rob Manning